Eschatology and Lockdown image

Eschatology and Lockdown

0
1
0
One of the intriguing paradoxes of the Covid era is the way in which the optimists are the ones saying things are awful and we have to lock down, and the pessimists are the ones saying no it's not and no we don't. The politicians who, in personality terms, are sunny optimists (Hancock, Johnson) are the ones pushing for draconian measures; the people objecting most strongly to lockdown are generally those with a more pessimistic, dour or even gloomy disposition (like the Tory backbenchers who appear on the radio). The same inversion seems to have taken place amongst journalists and publications, at least if my reading is anything to go by. It seems odd, both politically and personally.

The reason is eschatological. The optimists are pushing for lockdown because they believe that, sooner or later, the cavalry will come and rescue us: a vaccine, or mass testing the like of which begins trials in Liverpool this week, or something else. The pessimists are objecting to lockdown because they think the vaccine may be a mirage, mass testing has been overpromised and underdelivered several times already, and we cannot place our hope in a Micawberish belief that something will turn up.

That dynamic is as old as the hills. Fears about the future make us want to “eat and drink, for tomorrow we die.” Hope for the future makes us more prepared to endure hardship in the present, for “if we hope for what we do not see, we wait for it with patience.”

← Prev article
Next article →